For my essay 5 I want to write about Paul Edgecomb. He is such an interesting character in the green mile. He is able to look past John Coffey’s shell and see what he really is on the inside. He is the boss on the green mile, and has the ability to be a complete and total jerk to all the prisoners. I mean who are the prisoners going to complain too? They are on the Green Mile for a reason and I doubt that anyone would take action on their complaints. However, Paul goes out of his way to ensure that the prisoners are taken care of and are not treated badly despite the horrifying crimes that they have committed. Furthermore, Paul and the other guards risk their jobs and break the law to get John Coffey to see Melinda and have her healed. He risked everything to save his bosses wife. That compassion he has to do good is so deep and honest. Never the less, out of all the guards on the Green Mile he is the one who has personally electrocuted the most prisoners. Paul is only doing his job and granted these men are guilty criminals that have been sentenced to die, but it still takes a lot out of someone to be the one responsible for killing these criminals. I think there are several aspects to Paul Edgecomb and think he is a truly fascinating character.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
John or Paul?
Coffey or Edgecomb?
Ideas for Essay 5
Essay #5- Paul
This should be an easy essay for a final, but it will be difficult to explain specific events of Paul’s life and how they are affected.
Questions? Or Solutions?
essay 5
Essay 5
Essay 5
Essay 5
However, I am not 100% sure I can accurately analyze Dale and Mr. Jingles. This topic might be a little difficult as Mr. Jingles obviously has no lines to quote. It might be difficult to analyze a mouse...
Any suggestions?
D
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Annie Wilkes
I think it's very possible that Annie quit developing mentally at an early age, and that, while her body continued to grow into a woman, her mind remained stuck in an immature time. Her reasoning for her actions tends toward a very childish understanding of the world, and she has a very self-centered viewpoint. Some of the things she does, she does simply because it is what she wants to do, or because she wants to have something and can make it hers. Other times, she acts in a monstrous way, and explains it away with a very childish logic; for instance, she kills babies as a nurse, to save them the trouble of the world that they'll have to deal with as they get older. This is a very simplistic reasoning, and it seems very much the product of an immature mind coupled with her obvious manic-depressive problems.
I think that it would be very fascinating to continue to study Annie in more detail. She presents such a conundrum: one cannot completely hate her, as one would a cliched evil, mustache-twirling villain. She is pitiable, while still being terrifying and formidable. I think the way that she breaks Paul Sheldon down so effectively is also a terrific point of interest for the character. She has a dominating personality, but lacks the charisma to be truly evil, until the circumstances arise for her to have a captive. She is able to dominate him almost wholly, to the point that he is gibbering when the policemen finally find Paul in his prisoner's room. And yet, I don't think she really has the mental capacity, or the wider view of the world necessary to understand the hurt she is inflicting. She is truly a marvel of a character, and I think that King outdid himself with a true-to-life villain that one can *almost* relate to.
Essay 5
Essay Five Ideas
Essay 5 character analysis
For the last essay assignment I am thinking I am going to do a character analysis of Clayton Riddell from The Cell. My reasons for choosing him are pretty simple, I really loved reading The Cell and I think that since I spent more time with this character than any other this semester this should be the easiest character to write about. Clay struggles with many issues and also serves as a mirror of the common man, the reader, allowing us to place ourselves in his position and winder “what would I do?” Clay must choose between his own best interests and those of his child, he also struggles with the concepts of defeat and loss. When reading this book I often marveled at how calm he always seemed to be and how well he was able to process what was happening around him. I immediately thought of all the true life stories you read of people saving others lives and they always say “I just did what had to be done” again and again Clay just always did what had to be done.
Was Clay a hero? That is an interesting question because in reality there weren’t many things that he did that were extraordinarily heroic to be honest. His most heroic act was that he just continued to carry on regardless of how chaotic the world got around him. The astounding cast of supporting characters often did the heavy lifting and without the insight that they provided it is most likely that Clay would never have made it to the end. For those of us that are parents I think we can truly agree and say Clay did what any good parent does, he put him self in harm’s way to take care of his son. What is so heroic about that?